From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5963
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "David Kågedal" <davidk@lysator.liu.se>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Replying to the right people
Date: 16 Apr 1996 22:28:34 +0200
Sender: davidk@lysator.liu.se
Message-ID: <jpybnvlxql.fsf@tingeling.lysator.liu.se>
References: <jpohos79f3.fsf@tindra.lysator.liu.se>
	<w8slojwawmq.fsf@hler.ifi.uio.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146488 1942 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:41:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:41:28 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from biggulp.callamer.com (root@biggulp.callamer.com [199.74.141.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA03397 for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 14:19:30 -0700
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by biggulp.callamer.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA32047 for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 14:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
Original-Received: from lysander.lysator.liu.se (mailhost.lysator.liu.se [130.236.253.3]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <WAA07332@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 22:28:47 +0200
Original-Received: from tingeling.lysator.liu.se (davidk@tingeling.lysator.liu.se [130.236.253.25]) by lysander.lysator.liu.se (8.7.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA29839; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 22:28:42 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: (from davidk@localhost) by tingeling.lysator.liu.se (8.7.4/8.7.3) id WAA27319; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 22:28:35 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: D]XdQ0Lvl](98/?#ke.70P&g#NMUCf!)RIE}'k~=+N;#R2uW:$?JwjbU*jlrOh<0}LlKrwJ
 '+U#<iQtLnEq4>I_Mg|YVK\yHGVs`<cyJs.H_rL_-qNlC@Z{.l>iy-^RoC(Sq'H3Bv*&'aL`!\Sk?[
 Y^soDZ`fP_My5y282q2T<iZe)
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 16 Apr 1996 19:47:57 +0200
Original-Lines: 1
X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.73/Emacs 19.30
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5963
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5963

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:

> "David Kågedal" <davidk@lysator.liu.se> writes:
> 
> > What happened to gnus-reply-to-function in 0.73? It isn't used to find
> > out who to send replies to anymore. Is this a bug, or is there a new
> > variable that I don't know of?
> 
> All the old Gnus message composition variables are obsolete.  In 0.73
> you can use `message-reply-to-function' to do what the old
> `gnus-reply-to-function' did.  Sort of.

Yes, sort of. But it's not nearly as useful. There seems to be no way
of using information about what group the mail was split into, like
the way gnus-reply-to-function provided a group parameter. This means
I have to do a new version of my splitting regexps just for this. Or
maybe use the existing splitting routine? Maybe the last option would
work, but I liked it better before.

-- 
David Kågedal     Lysator Academic Computer Society       davidk@lysator.liu.se
http://www.lysator.liu.se/~davidk/                              +46-13 17 65 89