From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/78226 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus compatibility with the lexical binding branch Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 20:42:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871v2ako4c.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87lj0ha52s.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87y64g6833.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ei5tzneu.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <877hbjkquz.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87tyemgenp.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87tyem3qy0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87lizygdhe.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <87pqp9ejip.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301445844 29457 80.91.229.12 (30 Mar 2011 00:44:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:44:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Kastrup , To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: ding-owner+M26536@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Mar 30 02:44:00 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4jVv-00033u-JZ for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 02:43:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4jUv-0007Hn-2m; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:42:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4jUt-0007Ha-Jv for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:42:55 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4jUs-0002M9-FW for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:42:55 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4jUr-0002Vo-9R for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 02:42:53 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAAB8kk1FpZRw/2dsb2JhbAClUHiIebYOhWoElhQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,265,1299474000"; d="scan'208";a="98593541" Original-Received: from 69-165-148-112.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.165.148.112]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 29 Mar 2011 20:42:21 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B572D660C7; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 20:42:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87pqp9ejip.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:53:02 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:78226 Archived-At: > Is there an example of how to do this properly, how to test that it's > correct, and is there any way to catch it at the byte-compile stage? Example, no, and neither "tests that it's correct", but the Texinfo doc includes a discussion of how to do it (using byte-compiler messages to catch likely problems). Stefan