From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/77832 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: can Gnus simply use the Emacs bug tracker? Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:41:44 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8762rk2vah.fsf@lifelogs.com> <6iy64gxk4z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87lj0gyxld.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877hbzxj11.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300290123 10648 80.91.229.12 (16 Mar 2011 15:42:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 15:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 16 16:41:59 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzsrE-0000k9-Kf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:41:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39540 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzsrE-0007QM-4Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:41:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35504 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pzsr7-0007Q7-QG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:41:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pzsr4-0003B2-7Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:41:49 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:12822 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pzsr4-0003At-0M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:41:46 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAGN3gE1MCqJN/2dsb2JhbACmDXjBJoVjBJVa X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,194,1299474000"; d="scan'208";a="96838137" Original-Received: from 76-10-162-77.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([76.10.162.77]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 16 Mar 2011 11:41:45 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0DA50660BB; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:41:45 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <877hbzxj11.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:00:10 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137290 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:77832 Archived-At: >>> There was a point where Gnus was merged into Emacs. Do we want that to >>> be the separation point? Or do we want all non-trunk reports to go to >>> Gnus only? I'm not sure. GM> IMO, if someone is using the version of Gnus that came with their Emacs, GM> they should send bug reports to bug-gnu-emacs. If not, ie if they GM> downloaded a separate version of Gnus, then to bugs@gnus. > Oh, that makes perfect sense. So in the Gnus trunk we'll set > `M-x gnus-bug' to send to bugs@gnus.org and insert "Package: gnus". But > in the Emacs trunk the same command will send to bug-gnu-emacs and > insert "Package: emacs,gnus". Is that correct? Sounds fine to me. I'm also OK with sending ll to bug-gnu-emacs (and maybe distinguishing the two by using either "gnus" or "emacs,gnus" as package). Stefan