From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/58830 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Follow-up etc in NEW frame Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:15:48 -0400 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097615819 29870 80.91.229.6 (12 Oct 2004 21:16:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 21:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ding List Original-X-From: ding-owner+M7368@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Oct 12 23:16:43 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13] ident=mail) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CHU0h-0004zJ-00 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:16:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CHU05-0005lF-00; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:16:05 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CHTzy-0005l9-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:15:58 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CHTzv-000545-RF for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:15:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (mercure.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.67]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838A53A01FC for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:15:51 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF9A8282A6 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:15:50 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8844AC5A0 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:15:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2F14B8CA23; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:15:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4pwIVweX/C+QnJasBJL/bGjkgGI= In-Reply-To: (Reiner Steib's message of "Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:41:45 +0200") Posted-To: gnu.emacs.gnus X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=0, requis 5) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58830 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58830 The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gnu.emacs.gnus as well. > [ Added Cc to the ding list. If anyone thinks that this patch is not > the right solution, please speak up. I'd suggest to contionue the > thread on the ding list. ] Raising the frame just reduces the pain but doesn't eliminate the problem. E.g. with multi-workspace window-manager, the frame you're raising might not even be visible, so raising it won't help much. I think the right solution is to prompt the user before killing the buffer. Stefan