From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/74424 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnutls status Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:42:27 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87ipzkmgfn.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290796960 32480 80.91.229.12 (26 Nov 2010 18:42:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 18:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 26 19:42:36 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PM3Fj-0007YX-Rj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 19:42:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57164 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PM3Fj-0001fH-8T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:42:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49817 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PM3Fd-0001dI-RO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:42:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PM3Fc-000138-NV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:42:29 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:23446 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PM3Fc-000134-Je for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:42:28 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwJABaO70xFxKB0/2dsb2JhbACiEn1ywCyFRwSEXI1t X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,262,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="83790102" Original-Received: from 69-196-160-116.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.160.116]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 26 Nov 2010 13:42:27 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B575E660DC; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:42:27 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Julien Danjou's message of "Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:56:14 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133177 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:74424 Archived-At: >> Many people use Debian stable, so until it's not in Debian stable, it's >> not really in Debian. > But does many people use Debian stable with emacs development version? That's not the relevant question: the relevant question is whether 2.10 will be in Debian stable by the time Emacs-24 is released. It might, but I'm not completely sure. Stefan