From: Joakim Hove <joakim.hove@phys.ntnu.no>
Subject: Re: What view for these nasty word *.doc files
Date: 24 Jan 2002 11:34:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <k0n3d0w2g2g.fsf@metropolis.phys.ntnu.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1it9scby6.fsf@reader.newsguy.com> (Harry Putnam's message of "Thu, 24 Jan 2002 02:11:30 -0800")
Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> writes:
Thanks for your reply,
> I should be able to just hit <RET> on the part and see it right?
> (Even without word-lisp.el installed ... right?)
ehh - no. That would of course have been the best solution, and
probably quite simple to implement. Point is that the word-lisp
solution is written to view doc-files which I have in my own
filesystem, i.e. not attachements.
> Displaying /usr/local/bin/antiword /tmp/emm.234146QP/containers.doc..
So what I do is to:
1. Save the doc-file to a doc file in my own home directory with "o".
2. Open this doc-file with M-x load-word-file
But I absolutely agree that writing a small wrapper to combine to the
two when treating attatchements would be wise.
If you could try my prcedure listed above, and then give a new opinion
of word-lisp I would be very grateful.
Regards
Joakim Hove
--
==== Joakim Hove www.phys.ntnu.no/~hove/ =======================
|| Institutt for fysikk (735) 93637 / E3-166 | Skøyensgate 10D ||
|| N - 7491 Trondheim hove@phys.ntnu.no | N - 7030 Trondheim ||
================================================= 73 93 31 68 =========
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-24 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-23 23:00 Harry Putnam
2002-01-23 23:17 ` Bjørn Mork
2002-01-24 2:18 ` Harry Putnam
2002-01-23 23:32 ` Henrik Enberg
2002-01-23 23:44 ` Henrik Enberg
2002-01-24 0:00 ` Jorge Godoy
2002-01-26 16:22 ` Johan Kullstam
2002-01-26 21:29 ` Steinar Bang
2002-01-24 1:47 ` Harry Putnam
2002-01-24 8:32 ` Joakim Hove
2002-01-24 9:00 ` Bjørn Mork
2002-01-26 21:55 ` Steinar Bang
2002-01-26 22:34 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-27 9:40 ` Steinar Bang
2002-01-24 10:11 ` Harry Putnam
2002-01-24 10:34 ` Joakim Hove [this message]
2002-01-24 17:35 ` Harry Putnam
2002-01-24 10:35 ` Harry Putnam
2002-01-24 10:42 ` Mark Trettin
2002-01-28 7:03 ` w3m clashes with mime types (Was: Re: What view for these nasty word *.doc files) Ami Fischman
2002-01-28 7:21 ` Ami Fischman
2002-01-28 12:44 ` w3m clashes with mime types Katsumi Yamaoka
2002-01-28 23:59 ` Daniel Pittman
2002-01-29 9:47 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-01-29 10:47 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2002-01-29 12:02 ` Daniel Pittman
2002-01-24 10:52 ` What view for these nasty word *.doc files Kai Großjohann
2002-01-24 17:29 ` Harry Putnam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=k0n3d0w2g2g.fsf@metropolis.phys.ntnu.no \
--to=joakim.hove@phys.ntnu.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).