From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/26167 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Colin Marquardt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: New approach to grouping/backend/marking - good or bad idea? Date: 04 Nov 1999 11:09:43 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87k8nzgk9n.fsf@raven.localnet> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163427 17987 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:23:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Keywords: keywords,articles Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA07142 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 1999 05:38:59 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAB19491; Thu, 4 Nov 1999 04:38:48 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 04 Nov 1999 04:38:23 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA00808 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 1999 04:38:08 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sls26e.stgl.netd.alcatel.de (mailrelay1.alcatel.de [194.113.59.75]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA07137 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 1999 05:37:36 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sls4a1.stgl.sel.alcatel.de by sls26e.stgl.netd.alcatel.de with SMTP (XT-PP) with ESMTP; Thu, 4 Nov 1999 11:09:33 +0100 Original-Received: from slse6v.SSD-HW-stgl (slse6v [149.204.240.36]) by sls4a1.stgl.sel.alcatel.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8-tak-vsehServer-990121) with ESMTP id LAA23371 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 1999 11:09:44 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (from cmarqu@localhost) by slse6v.SSD-HW-stgl (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id LAA09526; Thu, 4 Nov 1999 11:09:43 +0100 (MET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Rob Browning's message of "03 Nov 1999 18:42:12 -0600" Original-Lines: 29 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.43/XEmacs 21.1 - "Arches" Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26167 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26167 * Rob Browning writes: > There are two bits here. The bit that I feel pretty sure is a good > idea is that of adding "message keywords" to Gnus. Imagine that you > can (either manually, or via automatic means like the split process), > add arbitrary keywords to articles. These keywords could then be used > for whatever you like, but I could imeediately see a use for them in > searches, narrows, etc. This would easily eliminate all the arguments > that keep me from being happy just using total-expire. > For example, I would like to use a "todo" keyword, and attach that to > articles that I need to do something about. Then I could enter a > group and do a "/ k todo" or whatever, and see all those articles. Karl Kleinpaste has written | ;;; messkeyw.el --- automatic keyword support during composition. which is part of GNU Emacs (so it says). | ;; This provides a hookable mechanism by which to have Keywords | ;; headers automatically generated based on word frequency of the | ;; body. The goal is to make it possible to score on Keywords | ;; provided, of course, that Keywords gets to the overview files. I seem to remember that there was a HOWTO somewhere about adding the keywords afterwards to exisiting articles. This may be a start. Colin