From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4642 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: New features + feature freeze? Date: 10 Jan 1996 19:33:11 +0100 Organization: Xmas Exiles Sender: larsi@bjob.no Message-ID: References: <199512220356.WAA12488@loiosh.kei.com> <55u42t3uny.fsf@galil.austnsc.tandem.com> <91jpy7y1.fsf@bjob.no> <199601070133.TAA02528@grendel.texas.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145362 30341 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:22:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from moonbase_v.moonvalley.com (root@moonbase_v.moonvalley.com [204.212.162.1]) by miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA21260 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 21:24:28 -0800 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by moonbase_v.moonvalley.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA25710 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 21:14:45 -0800 Original-Received: from Norway.EU.net (nic.eunet.no [193.71.1.1]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 12 Jan 1996 05:52:19 +0100 Original-Received: by Norway.EU.net with UUCP id AA24980 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4/EUnet/NO for ding@ifi.uio.no); Fri, 12 Jan 1996 05:52:17 +0100 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by redleaf.bbs.no (8.6.12/8.6.9) id SAA01512; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 18:51:27 GMT Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Sten Drescher's message of Sat, 6 Jan 1996 19:33:44 -0600 Original-Lines: 28 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4642 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4642 Sten Drescher writes: > >> The threads need to be gathered first, then sorted, since > >> gnus-thread-sort-functions are supposed to be sorting threads, not > >> articles within threads. > > LMI> Yes, I agree. Hmn. Or at least I think I do. Can't somebody > LMI> convince me that this is a bad idea? This sounds like Real Work > LMI> fixing this, and I certainly don't like Real Work. :-) > > It should be fixed, because you are apparently using > gnus-thread-sort-functions as gnus-article-sort-functions. Uhm. I don't quite know what you mean -- `gnus-article-sort-functions' is used only when not using a threaded display. But I have added sorting of gathered threads now. > It confuses me as to how you can sort threads by their total score > before the threads have been gathered, since the threads need to be > gathered before you know what goes together for the total score. Well -- gathered threads don't have a score, really. -- Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen * larsi@ifi.uio.no (a red leaf that falls from the purple tree)