Re: nnmail-split-fancy

Re: nnmail-split-fancy

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

davidbe@msil.sps.mot.com (E. David Bell) writes:

> The BBDB split is returning the correct value but nnmail-split-fancy
> is ignoring it.

Could you try upgrading to 0.90 and see whether this works better
there? 

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Re: nnmail-split-fancy

[E. David Bell]

  >> The BBDB split is returning the correct value but
  >> nnmail-split-fancy is ignoring it.

  Lars> Could you try upgrading to 0.90 and see whether this works
  Lars> better there?

Lars-

I upgraded to 0.91 and it seems to make the problem worse.  Now the
nnmail-split-fancy sends everything to "other" even if it should have
a match _before_ the BBDB split.


-- 
-David
________________________________________________________________
E. David Bell                       |   davidbe@msil.sps.mot.com
Motorola Semiconductor Israel Ltd.  |             972-9-952-2685

Re: nnmail-split-fancy

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

davidbe@msil.sps.mot.com (E. David Bell) writes:

> I upgraded to 0.91 and it seems to make the problem worse.  Now the
> nnmail-split-fancy sends everything to "other" even if it should have
> a match _before_ the BBDB split.

What is your complete `nnmail-split-fancy' variable?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Re: nnmail-split-fancy

[E. David Bell]

  >> I upgraded to 0.91 and it seems to make the problem worse.  Now
  >> the nnmail-split-fancy sends everything to "other" even if it
  >> should have a match _before_ the BBDB split.

  Lars> What is your complete `nnmail-split-fancy' variable?

(setq nnmail-split-fancy
  '(| 
      ("From" "davidbe" "test1")
      (: gnus-bbdb-split-method)
      "other"
      )
  )

-- 
-David
________________________________________________________________
E. David Bell                       |   davidbe@msil.sps.mot.com
Motorola Semiconductor Israel Ltd.  |             972-9-952-2685

Re: nnmail-split-fancy

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

davidbe@msil.sps.mot.com (E. David Bell) writes:

>       (: gnus-bbdb-split-method)

I've looked over the code, and I can't see anything weird about it:

     ;; Builtin : operation.
     ((eq (car split) ':)
      (nnmail-split-it (save-excursion (eval (cdr split)))))

Anyone?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

nnmail-split-fancy

[Sebastian Luque]

Hello,

Can somebody please clarify why using concat to provide a regexp in the
following nnmail-split-fancy is not allowed?  For example:

(setq nnmail-split-fancy
      '(| ("from" (concat "my " "regexp") "MyGroup")
	  (: spam-split)
	  "mail.misc"))

does not work, and would send all messages to the bogus group, but without
using concat:

(setq nnmail-split-fancy
      '(| ("from" "my regexp" "MyGroup")
	  (: spam-split)
	  "mail.misc"))

is fine.  The reason I want to use concat is to simplify maintenance of
the regexps in several lines.

Thanks in advance,

-- 
Sebastian P. Luque

Re: nnmail-split-fancy

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

>>>>> In <87oe7p4lmy.fsf@gmail.com> Sebastian Luque wrote:

> Can somebody please clarify why using concat to provide a regexp in the
> following nnmail-split-fancy is not allowed?  For example:

> (setq nnmail-split-fancy
>       '(| ("from" (concat "my " "regexp") "MyGroup")
> 	  (: spam-split)
> 	  "mail.misc"))

I actually use concat in the way similar to the following:

(setq nnmail-split-fancy
      `(| ("from" ,(concat "my " "regexp") "MyGroup")
	  (: spam-split)
	  "mail.misc"))

Maybe we need to improve the nnmail code if we really want to
use it without backquotes.

nnmail-split-fancy

[Alok G. Singh]

The spam system at work adds the following regexp to the subject to identify spam: "{Spam\\?}". I verified this regexp using regexp-builder in the summary buffer. 

When I try and add a rule to nnmail-split-fancy 
          (subject "{Spam\\?}" "mail.spam")
it does not send mails with {Spam?} in their subjects to mail.spam. A couple of sample subject headers are below.

Subject: {Spam?} This stock has amazing ...
Subject: {Spam?}

Is it something wrong in the regexp or something to do with nnmail-split-fancy-match-partial-words ?

-- 
Alok

Creditor, n.:
	A man who has a better memory than a debtor.

Re: nnmail-split-fancy

[Adrian Aichner]

alephnull@airtelbroadband.in (Alok G. Singh) writes:

> The spam system at work adds the following regexp to the subject to identify spam: "{Spam\\?}". I verified this regexp using regexp-builder in the summary buffer. 
>
> When I try and add a rule to nnmail-split-fancy 
>           (subject "{Spam\\?}" "mail.spam")
> it does not send mails with {Spam?} in their subjects to mail.spam. A couple of sample subject headers are below.
>
> Subject: {Spam?} This stock has amazing ...
> Subject: {Spam?}
>
> Is it something wrong in the regexp or something to do with nnmail-split-fancy-match-partial-words ?

What is your value of nnmail-split-fancy-match-partial-words ?

If it's t, the above could work, but definitely not with
nnmail-split-fancy-match-partial-words set to nil.

-- 
Adrian Aichner
 mailto:adrian@xemacs.org
 http://www.xemacs.org/

Re: nnmail-split-fancy

[Alok G. Singh]

On 30 Jul 2006, adrian@xemacs.org wrote:

>> When I try and add a rule to nnmail-split-fancy (subject
>> "{Spam\\?}" "mail.spam") it does not send mails with {Spam?} in
>> their subjects to mail.spam.

> If it's t, the above could work, but definitely not with
> nnmail-split-fancy-match-partial-words set to nil.

Yes, that worked. It also fixed some other rules as well :) Thank you.

-- 
Alok

teamwork, n.:
	Having someone to blame.