From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/75748 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Moving Split Rules from Gnus 5.13 to NoGnus (IMAP) Not Working Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:02:02 +0100 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: References: <87wrmfch0h.fsf@eps142.cdf.udc.es> <24ipxzje1z.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <87ei86qsn5.fsf@maru.md5i.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295629360 26864 80.91.229.12 (21 Jan 2011 17:02:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 17:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Michael Welsh Duggan Original-X-From: ding-owner+M24099@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Jan 21 18:02:34 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PgKNd-0000Ry-Pc for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:02:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PgKNU-0002wu-FJ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:02:24 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PgKNT-0002wi-5s for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:02:23 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PgKNO-0006di-NJ for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:02:22 -0600 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PgKNN-0004lU-Of for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:02:17 +0100 Original-Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so1722308bwz.17 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:02:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :organization:message-id:references:user-agent:mime-version :content-type; bh=o+GhoZpJDw7694VZPeXX071svEM2ileT+Dehd5+klBk=; b=M5OqK5biKNlxS/rL6jClF/QBqO+E5ehWWaOXzyhkST1QGeKMBHI60bxSGunLMMDAnb SjRraYcgZJdGpLnJpk6hcwkywRwmR82EvaiuH7xLsslgueOk/xaasyH+STUri1YVYpZ0 2MMbWi/FBdJLiEqMRbCNJH/+PccV+SeHx8OIk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=G39lova0Objv+Y+yfgYIWE/Wfsifux1shu0j9/wdBqtih7H5aLpwSw+dQSpcJPVoTm /8omHFt5ne4CCjX/ace5k+Nc+80W1XR/HQ08a4xe+YW6Fq/gbNTlGJDmwmXL3EjZy66j qo2eS6KtpPdEIg3s5nx8crccfo3/mWylCvLxE= Original-Received: by 10.204.53.78 with SMTP id l14mr917065bkg.16.1295629336918; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:02:16 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 12sm4701042bki.19.2011.01.21.09.02.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:02:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ei86qsn5.fsf@maru.md5i.com> (Michael Welsh Duggan's message of "Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:43:26 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:75748 Archived-At: Michael Welsh Duggan writes: > Aric writes: > >> I'm certainly missing something here. I have kept trying, but it just >> fails to work. >> >> (setq gnus-secondary-select-methods >> '( >> (nnimap "One" >> (nnimap-address "address") >> (nnimap-stream ssl) >> (nnimap-inbox "INBOX") >> (nnimap-expunge-on-close t) >> (nnimap-split-methods nnimap-split-fancy) >> (nnimap-split-predicate "UNDELETED") >> (nnimap-split-crosspost nil)) >> etc more servers >> (setq nnimap-split-inbox "INBOX" >> nnimap-split-fancy ;; >> '(| ;; (2) >> (: gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent) ;; (3) >> ;; splitting rules go here ;; (4) >> (any "promed-digest@promedmail.org" "PROMED") >> etc > > nnimap-split-fancy no longer exists as a function. It was always a > fairly unnecessary duplication of nnmail-split-fancy. If you change > both instances of nnimap-split-fancy above to nnmail-split-fancy, > things nnimap-split-fancy does exist surely? Or it has in the examples given here.