From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18018 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: I fixed it, but I need Lars ... (Was: *Group* buffer disappearance) Date: 21 Oct 1998 17:48:54 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035156616 3954 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:30:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA25614 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 1998 11:50:17 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAB17525; Wed, 21 Oct 1998 10:50:01 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 21 Oct 1998 10:50:01 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA25600 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 1998 10:49:50 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA25601 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 1998 11:49:35 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id RAA12468; Wed, 21 Oct 1998 17:48:55 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: Lloyd Zusman X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > I must be missing something, then. The only places I have > discovered this cleanup being done in the pre-meddling version of > the code is during `gnus-summary-exit' and `gnus-group-exit-hook'. > Therefore, I fully understand the need for putting an > `unwind-protect' around `(funcall method)' ... but I don't > understand the need for the other `unwind-protect' that you > mentioned in your previous message. Think about it this way: again, that's what the code did before I meddled. The only thing I added is to make it do the same thing when the user presses C-g at the save prompt. The unwind-protect around (funcall method) is, I think, needed in case method is something other than save-file. -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm.