From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18101 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Whee! Date: 24 Oct 1998 21:52:00 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035156684 4418 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:31:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA28162 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 1998 15:52:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAB18797; Sat, 24 Oct 1998 14:52:38 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 24 Oct 1998 14:52:41 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA27623 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 1998 14:52:32 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA28157 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 1998 15:52:15 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id VAA01189; Sat, 24 Oct 1998 21:52:00 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > I just received an uuencoded mail for the first time since installing > Zhu's mm-uu, and I got those neat buttons for the uuencoded body. It has bugs, though. If the message is: then begins with a spurious newline, and is not shown at all. > And then I could treat the uuencoded parts just as if they were MIME > parts. *Way* neat! Agreed. > Anyway, this led me to thinking about message/partial and series of > uuencoded articles. How should these be treated? It would be nice > if message/partial and uuencoded series were also handled in similar > manners, but what should Gnus do? Should Gnus remove the "other" > parts of a message/partial from the summary buffer, or, uhm. Or > what? I think Gnus should insert a "virtual" article that merges them all. Creation of the virtual article should probably be bound to a command (I'm not sure if it's a good idea to make it automatic.) Then you could also safely remove them from the summary. Or even limit them out, so that `/ w' would restore them... -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code.