From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10057 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Checking `Reply-To' Date: 01 Mar 1997 07:11:00 +0100 Sender: hniksic@public.srce.hr Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149988 22137 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:39:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA06786 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 22:20:10 -0800 Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 07:11:04 +0100 Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4) id HAA04333; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 07:11:01 +0100 (MET) Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-URL: ftp://gnjilux.cc.fer.hr/pub/unix/util/wget/ X-Attribution: Hrv X-Face: &}4JQk=L;e.~x+|eo]#DGk@x3~ed!.~lZ}YQcYb7f[WL9L'Z*+OyA\nAEL1M(".[qvI#a2E 6WYI5>>e7'@_)3Ol9p|Nn2wNa/;~06jL*B%tTcn/XvhAu7qeES0\|MF%$;sI#yn1+y" In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 01 Mar 1997 00:34:45 +0100 Original-Lines: 23 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.15/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10057 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10057 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > That review was the strongest blow to the authority of GNKSA I've seen > so far. The reviewer wibbled on and on about how much he didn't like > the user interface and what features he wished that it had[...] Yup. The part about the program not being multi-threaded was infamous. After several criticisms in private mail (probably by many people, not just me), the reviewer promised to separate the GNKSA requirements from his own opinions. > > Regardless of GNKSA, I think Gnus should perform the same checks for > > `Reply-To' as it does for `From'. What do you think? > > Well, people shouldn't include Reply-To headers unless they need to, > and if they need to, they probably know what they are doing. You are probably right. The point of GNKSA are the default settings. -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- "Psychos _do not_ explode when sunlight hits them."