From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8651
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Multiple nnml hierarchies, with separate procmail spools
Date: 07 Nov 1996 20:46:15 +0100
Sender: hniksic@public.srce.hr
Message-ID: <kig4tj1adtk.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
References: <vpsp6nghvu.fsf@dogbert.tivoli.com> <m2683ic26v.fsf@proletcult.ifi.uio.no> <vphgn2hekw.fsf@dogbert.tivoli.com> <m2k9rx8a2e.fsf@proletcult.ifi.uio.no> <vpvibhrixe.fsf@dogbert.tivoli.com> <yvia7mnxdaeg.fsf@atreides.mindspring.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148786 13478 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:19:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:19:46 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: The Ding List <ding@ifi.uio.no>
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 25449 invoked from smtpd); 7 Nov 1996 20:13:10 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 1996 20:13:09 -0000
Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <UAA28254@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 20:47:38 +0100
Original-Received: from hniksic@localhost by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.2/8.6.12.CI)
	id UAA17910; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 20:46:16 +0100 (MET)
Original-To: Sudish Joseph <sudish@mindspring.com>
X-URL: ftp://gnjilux.cc.fer.hr/pub/unix/util/wget/
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: &}4JQk=L;e.~x+|eo]#DGk@x3~ed!.~lZ}YQcYb7f[WL9L'Z*+OyA\nAEL1M(".[qvI#a2E
 6WYI5>>e7'@_)3Ol9p|Nn2wNa/;~06jL*B%tTcn/XvhAu7qeES0\|MF%$;sI#yn1+y"
In-Reply-To: Sudish Joseph's message of 07 Nov 1996 13:31:51 -0500
Original-Lines: 13
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.55/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8651
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8651

Sudish Joseph (sudish@mindspring.com) wrote:
> I've suggested this before: it'd be cool if we allowed per-group new
> mail sources.  In this case, you'd associate a different spool file
> with each of the above groups.

Yes, it would be fun -- I've always wanted to reach some groups
through procmail, and some from the main spool, etc.  Thus you could
combine procmail and Gnus mail splitting.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
The end of the world is coming...  SAVE YOUR BUFFERS!