From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10409
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Negotiating key mappings in message mode
Date: 30 Mar 1997 05:38:02 +0200
Sender: hniksic@public.srce.hr
Message-ID: <kig7miqgicl.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
References: <m2lo765bl1.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150285 24264 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:44:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:44:45 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA22697
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Sat, 29 Mar 1997 19:49:14 -0800
Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <FAA17143@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 05:38:08 +0200
Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id FAA24089; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 05:38:02 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-URL: ftp://gnjilux.cc.fer.hr/pub/unix/util/wget/
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: &}4JQk=L;e.~x+|eo]#DGk@x3~ed!.~lZ}YQcYb7f[WL9L'Z*+OyA\nA
        EL1M(".[qvI#a2E6WYI5>>e7'@_)3Ol9p|Nn2wNa/;~06jL*B%tTcn/X
        vhAu7qeES0\|MF%$;sI#yn1+y"
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 29 Mar 1997 18:59:38 -0800
Original-Lines: 44
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.15
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10409
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10409

Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

> I've started writing a footnote plug-in for message mode and am
> rather at a loss where I can put the interactive commands.  My first
> thought was to use C-c C-f but there appears to be a bunch of
> message-goto functions there.  Is it O.K. for me to share that
> prefix[1], or should I choose something else (and what)?

I don't think you should share a reserved prefix.  Think of something
else.  The free `C-c C-<letter>' ones are:

`C-c C-a', `C-c C-j', `C-c C-l', `C-c C-m', `C-c C-p', `C-c C-u',
`C-c C-v', `C-c C-x' and `C-c C-z'.

I'd use `C-c C-a' or `C-c C-p'...

> [1] Why doesn't the C-c C-f prefix have its own keymap with a
> functional C-h binding?

`C-c C-f C-h' works for me:

Key bindings starting with C-c C-f:

Local Bindings:
key             binding
---             -------

C-c C-f C-b	message-goto-bcc
C-c C-f C-c	message-goto-cc
C-c C-f C-d	message-goto-distribution
C-c C-f C-f	message-goto-followup-to
C-c C-f C-k	message-goto-keywords
C-c C-f C-n	message-goto-newsgroups
C-c C-f C-r	message-goto-reply-to
C-c C-f C-s	message-goto-subject
C-c C-f C-t	message-goto-to
C-c C-f C-u	message-goto-summary
C-c C-f C-w	message-goto-fcc


-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
The end of the world is coming...  SAVE YOUR BUFFERS!