`n' and `p' in Group buffer

`n' and `p' in Group buffer

[Stefan Waldherr]

Hi,

would it be a good idea to let `n' and `p' cycle? Suppose this:

	1: group1
	0: group2
	0: group3
	0: group4

Your cursor is on `group4', your finger on the `n' because you used `n' to hop
thru groups 2 and 3. Now, there is no next group with new mail in it, but
there is a previous group with new mail. Of course, you don't want to press
`p' -- cycle to the rescue! Good or evil?

cu
Stefan.

-- 
Stefan Waldherr                office +1 (412) 268-3837
                                  fax +1 (412) 268-5576
                               e-Mail swa@cs.cmu.edu
                                  www http://www.waldherr.org/

Re: `n' and `p' in Group buffer

[Hrvoje Niksic]

Stefan Waldherr <swa@cs.cmu.edu> writes:

> Your cursor is on `group4', your finger on the `n' because you used
> `n' to hop thru groups 2 and 3. Now, there is no next group with new
> mail in it, but there is a previous group with new mail. Of course,
> you don't want to press `p' -- cycle to the rescue! Good or evil?

Sounds like not really necessary.  I find the `.' command very useful
in this case.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Oh lord won't you buy me a color TV...

Re: `n' and `p' in Group buffer

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Stefan Waldherr <swa@cs.cmu.edu> writes:

> Your cursor is on `group4', your finger on the `n' because you used
> `n' to hop thru groups 2 and 3. Now, there is no next group with new
> mail in it, but there is a previous group with new mail. Of course,
> you don't want to press `p' -- cycle to the rescue! Good or evil?

Eeeeevil!  Get thee behind me, Satan!

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen