Re: using pop3.el instead of

[Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>]

Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no> writes:

> Trying to accomodate Xemacs, I had temporarily removed Gnus 5.4.25
> from the load-path of GNU Emacs 19.34, so I was running 5.3 there
> instead (what exactly are the incompatibles of .elc files of Xemacs
> 19.15 and GNU Emacs 19.34?  Do the latter need Lars' patches to
> coexist?).

The best way to share Lisp code between the two is to byte-compile in
XEmacs.  This may sound XEmacs-centric, but it's not intended to be.
Emacs 19.35 and XEmacs 19.15 will be better at sharing byte-code, I
think.

Another reason not to use Gnus 5.3 in XEmacs is that you don't get the
toolbar and icons and all the gooey stuff.

I byte-compile Gnus with XEmacs, and can run it from GNU Emacs
normally.  But then again, XEmacs is my regular environment, so I'm
biased. :-(

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly.  
It just happens to be selective about who it makes friends with.