From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10579
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: using pop3.el instead of
Date: 06 Apr 1997 21:02:12 +0200
Sender: hniksic@public.srce.hr
Message-ID: <kigafncm0uj.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
References: <whybaysifi.fsf@norne.metis.no> <wklo6ytmfr.fsf@peorth.gweep.net> <whk9mgc9a4.fsf@norne.metis.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150426 25194 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:47:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:47:06 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA10838
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 12:13:46 -0700
Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <VAA01653@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 21:02:32 +0200
Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id VAA26498; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 21:02:13 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-URL: ftp://gnjilux.cc.fer.hr/pub/unix/util/wget/
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: &}4JQk=L;e.~x+|eo]#DGk@x3~ed!.~lZ}YQcYb7f[WL9L'Z*+OyA\nA
        EL1M(".[qvI#a2E6WYI5>>e7'@_)3Ol9p|Nn2wNa/;~06jL*B%tTcn/X
        vhAu7qeES0\|MF%$;sI#yn1+y"
In-Reply-To: Steinar Bang's message of 06 Apr 1997 20:10:11 +0200
Original-Lines: 25
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.15
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10579
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10579

Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no> writes:

> Trying to accomodate Xemacs, I had temporarily removed Gnus 5.4.25
> from the load-path of GNU Emacs 19.34, so I was running 5.3 there
> instead (what exactly are the incompatibles of .elc files of Xemacs
> 19.15 and GNU Emacs 19.34?  Do the latter need Lars' patches to
> coexist?).

The best way to share Lisp code between the two is to byte-compile in
XEmacs.  This may sound XEmacs-centric, but it's not intended to be.
Emacs 19.35 and XEmacs 19.15 will be better at sharing byte-code, I
think.

Another reason not to use Gnus 5.3 in XEmacs is that you don't get the
toolbar and icons and all the gooey stuff.

I byte-compile Gnus with XEmacs, and can run it from GNU Emacs
normally.  But then again, XEmacs is my regular environment, so I'm
biased. :-(

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly.  
It just happens to be selective about who it makes friends with.