From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/19313 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: multipart/related test Date: 30 Nov 1998 01:42:39 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157686 10975 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:48:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA00722 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 19:43:29 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAB20572; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 18:43:10 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 29 Nov 1998 18:43:07 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA26541 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 18:42:56 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA00702 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 19:42:46 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id BAA05450; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 01:42:39 +0100 (MET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > Hrvoje Niksic writes: > > > We can implement XEmacs `buffer-string' like this, but that's > > monstrosity: > > If it makes any difference > > $ grep -n "(buffer-string" */*.el | grep -v "buffer-string)" > > in xemacs-packages/lisp results in: [...] We cannot really know how many people are using `buffer-string' in their code. Fortunately, it is possible to make the function backward compatible, but I, for one, will not bother sending out the patch; I'm way too disgusted. As strange as it may sound, XEmacs has a user-base of its own, and IMHO we cannot afford to change documented interfaces on Stallman's whims, at least not in areas where XEmacs implemented stuff before FSF Emacs. -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Your lucky number today is 29842924728. Look for it everywhere.