From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18156 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Pterodactyl Gnus v0.39 is released Date: 25 Oct 1998 20:45:33 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035156730 4698 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:32:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA28554 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 14:46:51 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAB25368; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 13:46:30 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 25 Oct 1998 13:46:00 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA10255 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 13:45:51 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA28540 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 14:45:49 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id UAA27565; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 20:45:33 +0100 (MET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > It is? Under Emacs 20.3 compiled-function-p is the obsolete function > that should not be used. :-) Yes, but in the file named `gnus-xmas.el' it would be nice to use the XEmacsish functions. Perhaps that's the XEmacs developer in me talking. > You should coordinate this with RMS. I don't see what's there to coordinate. The object is named `compiled-function', so the predicate is `compiled-function-p'. Like bufferp or framep or whatever. And this isn't anything new -- compiled functions have been there since at least 19.12. Besides, I think Common Lisp also has compiled-function-p. > (Actually, I think byte-code-function-p makes more sense, in case we > later get natively compiled functions, which would then be, like, > compiled-function-p'd functions. If they compile into compiled-function objects, compiled-function-p will return t on them. -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- aibohphobia (ay' bo fo beeya): n. The fear of palindromes.