From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/16948 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Those MIME requirements Date: 11 Sep 1998 20:10:58 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035155736 30833 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:15:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA17142 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 1998 14:16:15 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAF12404; Fri, 11 Sep 1998 12:43:57 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 11 Sep 1998 13:11:24 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA10650 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 1998 13:11:14 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA17076 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 1998 14:11:02 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id UAA11471; Fri, 11 Sep 1998 20:10:58 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/xDi&N7XG KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "11 Sep 1998 17:52:50 +0200" Original-Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070026 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.26) XEmacs/21.0 (Danish Landrace) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:16948 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:16948 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > > That would be fine, I think. Whether the new buffer is opened > > should depend on the content-disposition, shouldn't it? > > Currently, I don't do anything with Content-Disposition. Shouldn't > display of elements be up to the recipient, and not the sender? The sender should be allowed to express a preference. For example, a set of huge pictures attached to a message can be hazardous to insert in the buffer. In this case, sender can ask the recipient not to inline it. Or can't it? I'm not any kind of expert on MIME, though. -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- The end of the world is coming... SAVE YOUR BUFFERS!