From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18165
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Pterodactyl Gnus v0.39 is released
Date: 25 Oct 1998 23:51:24 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <kigemrwz24z.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
References: <m3d87hqknv.fsf@sparky.gnus.org> <kigyaq4oh2o.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <m3ww5opoxk.fsf@sparky.gnus.org> <kigd87go276.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <m31znwqnud.fsf@sparky.gnus.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035156737 4746 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:32:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:32:17 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA01924
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 17:52:21 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAB26357;
	Sun, 25 Oct 1998 16:52:08 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 25 Oct 1998 16:51:52 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA12373 for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 16:51:43 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA01857
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 17:51:38 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
	by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id XAA25686;
	Sun, 25 Oct 1998 23:51:24 +0100 (MET)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Attribution: Hrvoje
X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+,
        gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG
        O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h<L@)<XGh#XroV6xQg$VA8K
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "25 Oct 1998 23:27:22 +0100"
Original-Lines: 24
User-Agent: Gnus/5.07004 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.40) XEmacs/21.2(beta3) (Aglaia)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:18165
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:18165

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> > I don't see what's there to coordinate.  The object is named
> > `compiled-function', so the predicate is `compiled-function-p'.  Like
> > bufferp or framep or whatever.
> 
> Perhaps the object should be `byte-code-function' instead?
> 
> > And this isn't anything new -- compiled functions have been there
> > since at least 19.12.  Besides, I think Common Lisp also has
> > compiled-function-p.
> 
> Yes, but in CL this is true for functions that really are compiled,
> and not just byte-compiled.

I disagree with your distinction of "really compiled" vs.
"byte-compiled" functions.  It makes as much sense for compiled
functions to be called just that.  The type of the compilation is an
implementation detail.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?  Who knows?  Who cares?