From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10257
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Mangling my email to avoid spammers.
Date: 18 Mar 1997 01:14:37 +0100
Sender: hniksic@public.srce.hr
Message-ID: <kigende2h02.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
References: <Pine.WNT.3.95.970317130709.37R-100000@kirk.nca.asu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150158 23353 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:42:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:42:38 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA16706
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 16:38:07 -0800
Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <BAA14572@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 01:14:49 +0100
Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id BAA11439; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 01:14:38 +0100 (MET)
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-URL: ftp://gnjilux.cc.fer.hr/pub/unix/util/wget/
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: &}4JQk=L;e.~x+|eo]#DGk@x3~ed!.~lZ}YQcYb7f[WL9L'Z*+OyA\nA
        EL1M(".[qvI#a2E6WYI5>>e7'@_)3Ol9p|Nn2wNa/;~06jL*B%tTcn/X
        vhAu7qeES0\|MF%$;sI#yn1+y"
In-Reply-To: "C. R. Oldham"'s message of Mon, 17 Mar 1997 14:52:00 -0700 ()
Original-Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.26/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10257
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10257

"C. R. Oldham" <cro@nca.asu.edu> writes:

> I originally thought I could do this by adding to a hook, but I couldn't
> find the hook.  Is there one?

You can make a function to change the `user-mail-address' variable,
and call it from `message-setup-hook'.  Not that I approve of it, but
Gnus is (as always) giving you a possibility.

> Now, what about my Sender field?  Do I need to worry about it?  I
> would think that spammers grab every address they can get at.

I don't think so.  The practice seems to show that many of them don't
even grab the `Reply-To' header, let alone `Sender'.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Then...  his face does a complete change of expression.  It goes from
a "Vengeance is mine" expression, to a "What the fuck" blank look.