From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11149 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Never mind Date: 28 May 1997 19:14:07 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150908 28580 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:55:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from sandy.calag.com (root@sandy [206.190.83.128]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA26456 for ; Wed, 28 May 1997 11:40:12 -0700 Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by sandy.calag.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA30217 for ; Wed, 28 May 1997 11:40:04 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA14106 for ; Wed, 28 May 1997 13:39:24 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 28 May 1997 19:14:17 +0200 Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4) id TAA28989; Wed, 28 May 1997 19:14:08 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Attribution: Hrv X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/xDi&N7XG KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J X-Tom-Swifty: "I can't stand baby food," Tom said in a strained voice. In-Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann's message of 28 May 1997 17:43:10 +0200 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/XEmacs 20.2 Original-Lines: 24 Original-Xref: altair.xemacs.org dgnus-list:1539 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11149 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11149 Kai Grossjohann writes: > Kai> IMHO no article should be considered as read until the user has looked > Kai> at the downloaded copy. > > Lars> I was thinking aloud about what to do with articles that the > Lars> user has decided not to download. Because they are spam, or > Lars> are too big, or has a low score, or has bad hair. I think > Lars> they should be marked as read upon group entry so that they > Lars> are displayed (and the user can mark them as downloadable so > Lars> they'll be fetched at next download time), but won't get in > Lars> they way of normal reading. > > There should be a new mark for that. I don't think it would be wise to waste resources (in .newsrc.eld) for marking of spams/low-scores/bad-hairs. If I don't want it, then it's read. -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Ask not for whom the tolls.