From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10917
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: filling the References header
Date: 14 May 1997 03:11:34 +0200
Message-ID: <kigiv0mdfi1.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
References: <29476.863566240@eeyore.ibcinc.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150713 27215 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:51:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:51:53 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA05915
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 13 May 1997 18:30:36 -0700
Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <DAA14718@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Wed, 14 May 1997 03:11:44 +0200
Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id DAA08468; Wed, 14 May 1997 03:11:35 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Save-Project-Gutenberg: <URL:http://www.promo.net/pg/nl/pgny_nov96.html>
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
In-Reply-To: Roderick Schertler's message of Tue, 13 May 1997 19:30:40 -0400
Original-Lines: 19
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/XEmacs 19.15
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10917
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10917

Roderick Schertler <roderick@argon.org> writes:

> At some point Gnus stopped filling the References header in
> followups, but I'm not sure when.  Now the References header is
> formatted as a single line no matter how long it is.  Have I screwed
> it up or did Gnus stop filling References by default?

Gnus stopped doing it by default -- since 5.4, if I remember
correctly.  If there was an explanation for the change, I missed it.
Any way, it is understandable, as the continuation ``References'
actually caused problems some people, and the gain wasn't that big.

So, no.  You haven't screwed it up. :-)

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
not tried it."                                    -- Donald Knuth