From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/19505 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Automatic part insertion: едц and =?cn-gb-2312?b?s9TExMj7?= on the same line Date: 02 Dec 1998 22:33:43 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <6f67buzzff.fsf@dna.lth.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157843 11967 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:50:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA06127 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 16:36:26 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA16326; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 15:34:18 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 02 Dec 1998 15:34:12 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA03792 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 15:34:03 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA06094 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 16:33:53 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id WAA06768; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 22:33:43 +0100 (MET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > Vladimir Volovich writes: > > > Well, very nice. :-) I take my words back about automatical parts > > insertions, _provided_that_ there is an RFC which specifies that some > > part should be displayed as a continuation of the line of previous > > part (as gnus did when displaying your message). > > Quoth RFC2046: > > NOTE: The CRLF preceding the boundary delimiter line is conceptually > attached to the boundary so that it is possible to have a part that > does not end with a CRLF (line break). Body parts that must be > considered to end with line breaks, therefore, must have two CRLFs > preceding the boundary delimiter line, the first of which is part of > the preceding body part, and the second of which is part of the > encapsulation boundary. Note, however, that this says nothing about actually *displaying* multiparts. Netscape's horizontal ruler is not prohibited by this. -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- The Lord protects children and fools... But don't push it.