From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10938
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Question about ticked articles being unticked...
Date: 16 May 1997 20:05:11 +0200
Message-ID: <kigk9kz70o8.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
References: <199705161242.IAA00564@bedroom.cabi.net> <x0hgg3tsgq.fsf@sdsu.edu> <vafiv0jo47x.fsf@ls6.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <x0enb7a1zj.fsf@sdsu.edu> <kigsozn7335.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <x04tc3gw7s.fsf@sdsu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150732 27362 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:52:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:52:12 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA09887
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Fri, 16 May 1997 11:18:59 -0700
Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <UAA21766@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 16 May 1997 20:05:31 +0200
Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id UAA08616; Fri, 16 May 1997 20:05:12 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-To: Mark Boyns <boyns@sdsu.edu>
X-Save-Project-Gutenberg: <URL:http://www.promo.net/pg/nl/pgny_nov96.html>
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
In-Reply-To: Mark Boyns's message of 16 May 1997 10:31:19 -0700
Original-Lines: 21
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/XEmacs 19.15
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10938
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10938

Mark Boyns <boyns@sdsu.edu> writes:

> > > Ticked articles are automatically cached.
> > 
> > I don't think so.  At least in my settings (`gnus-use-cache' set to
> > `passive', which is the default).
> 
> I do think so... (and they are _in_ my cache still)
[...]
> gnus-use-cache's value is t

I repeat that `gnus-use-cache' is `passive' by default, at least
that's what I infer from the sources, and how it works for me.  If you
set it to anything else -- well, fine.  I'm talking about default
behaviour here.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
"Silence!" cries Freydag. "I did not call thee in for a consultation!" 
"They are my innards! I will not have them misread by a poseur!"