From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/15308 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Cool bug in URL parsing Date: 11 Jun 1998 23:53:46 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035154364 21402 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:52:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org (gwyn.tux.org [207.96.122.8]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id PAA16050 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 15:00:12 -0700 Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by gwyn.tux.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA09373 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 17:56:42 -0400 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAS21621; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 16:29:29 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 11 Jun 1998 16:54:31 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA05489 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 16:54:21 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 9284 invoked by uid 504); 11 Jun 1998 21:53:51 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 9281 invoked from network); 11 Jun 1998 21:53:50 -0000 Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@161.53.2.130) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 11 Jun 1998 21:53:49 -0000 Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.8/8.8.6) id XAA28857; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 23:53:47 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/xDi&N7XG KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J In-Reply-To: Dave Love's message of "Thu, 11 Jun 1998 17:34:06 GMT" Original-Lines: 31 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.11/XEmacs 21.0(beta41) - "San Clemente" Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:15308 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:15308 Dave Love writes: > >>>>> "Hrvoje" == Hrvoje Niksic writes: > > Hrvoje> Dave Love writes: > >> Is it really necessary to do (more-or-less slow) buttonizing > >> etc. automatically for the whole of a big message rather than > >> restricting it to sensible-sized regions at the top and bottom where > >> the relevant stuff is likely to be? > > Hrvoje> I believe it is necessary to scan the whole message. > > I wasn't proposing either preventing you doing so explicitly or > setting the limits arbitrarily large. Of course not, but I argued two things: 1) The default should be to scan the whole message, not only the parts at top and bottom; 2) The code should be optimized so that it is done fairly fast. However, if a maximum-message-size variable should be implemented, then yes, I agree with you that the parts at the top and the bottom should still be buttonized. -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- "Memory is like an orgasm. It's a lot better if you don't have to fake it." -- Seymour Cray, on virtual memory