From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12253
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: `invisible'?
Date: 21 Sep 1997 19:56:25 +0200
Message-ID: <kigoh5mim9i.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
References: <m2afh7l6p3.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <kigk9gb2uuj.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <m267ruwsco.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151822 2771 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:10:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:10:22 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16])
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA20569
	for <steve@altair.xemacs.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 1997 11:31:14 -0700
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA26145
	for <steve@xemacs.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 1997 13:27:14 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <TAA17897@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Sun, 21 Sep 1997 19:56:41 +0200
Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
	by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.7/8.8.6) id TAA10754;
	Sun, 21 Sep 1997 19:56:26 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Attribution: Hrvoje
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "21 Sep 1997 18:21:11 +0200"
Original-Lines: 18
X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.8/XEmacs 20.3(beta23) - "Sarajevo"
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12253
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12253

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:
> 
> > Maybe it should be a primitive to build a command to get the whole
> > thread?  Looks like it.
> 
> Yes, that makes sense.  A command to rebuild an entire thread could
> just bind that variable to `invisible', re-fetch the headers and then
> include the articles from the current thread in the limit.

Yup.  That is one of Gnus' most wanted commands.  For one, I'll be
very happy when you implement it.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?  Who knows?  Who cares?