From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/17739 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: compatibility request -- `q' in *Article* buffer shouldn't quit group Date: 11 Oct 1998 19:23:04 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035156386 2494 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:26:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA23481 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 1998 13:23:43 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAF24279; Sun, 11 Oct 1998 11:54:39 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 11 Oct 1998 12:23:38 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA13637 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 1998 12:23:30 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA23474 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 1998 13:23:17 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id TAA02821; Sun, 11 Oct 1998 19:23:05 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > > sb> Could `q' from inside the *Article* buffer please return to the > sb> *Summary* buffer the same way it did with TM? > > Lars> Er... I don't know. `h' is the traditional way of > Lars> skipping between the article and summary buffers. `q' has > Lars> always meant `quit', in one form or another. (Except in > Lars> TM, that is.) > > Well, if you think of it as a hierarchy (group, summary, article), > then using `q' to return to the summary buffer makes sense. Article buffer is not a part of that hierarchy. For example, pressing RET or SPC doesn't get you to the Article buffer. A while ago, someone has asked Lars to make `q' in Summary buffer perform `/ w' if there are any limits available. Lars refused because he thought that `q' shouldn't change its meaning. I agree. -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- * Q: What is an experienced Emacs user? * A: A person who wishes that the terminal had pedals.