From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/17834 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: new prefix needed for disblay? Date: 14 Oct 1998 18:22:08 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035156463 2910 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:27:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:27:43 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA12398 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 12:23:43 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAF09134; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 10:54:24 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 14 Oct 1998 11:23:15 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA07410 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 11:23:02 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA12383 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 12:22:51 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id SAA26533; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 18:22:08 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > I actually like the 'b' key being so short and sweet, however, I > know at some point in the future more keys are going to be needed to > deal with mime parts... Perhaps we should create a new mime-parts > prefix instead? Yup. This is what crossed my mind a few hours ago, but I mailed it to gnus@ding.org instead the other way around: I really hate switching to Article buffer and doing stuff there. How about a Summary command that accepts prefix argument like `b', and then just redirects to the attachment-specific command. E.g. `1 W M B o' -> save attachment no. 1 `3 W M B c' -> view attachment no. 3 in buffer etc. Also, we could shorten `W M B' to something decent much like `W M b' was shortened to `b'. All of this should be trivial to code, and yet really, *really* useful! -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- You can only be young once, but you can be immature forever.