From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18922 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: `b' Date: 19 Nov 1998 12:32:35 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157364 8809 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:42:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA07098 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 06:40:08 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAB14591; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 05:39:46 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 19 Nov 1998 05:39:38 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA23462 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 05:39:28 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA07014 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 06:32:44 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id MAA04985; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 12:32:36 +0100 (MET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > François Pinard writes: > > > I think, I may be biased (:-), that `C-d' does its job well, and even, that > > the code is not so badly written. Maybe it could do better now using `mm-*' > > stuff? Such `mm-*' did not exist at the time `C-d' became able to split > > MIME parts, and `C-d' has most probably not been reevaluated since then. > > You say that using `mm-*' will give us `uuencoded' parts? Anything else? > > I don't think so. I think the `C-d' on MIME multiparts works very > well, and I don't think it is productive to make the nndoc interface > more un-Gnusey. This part of Francois' message talked about the implementation of MIMEoid C-d, not its interface. -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Unspeakable horrors from outer space paralyze the living and resurrect the dead!