From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18645 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: !MML Date: 14 Nov 1998 21:52:02 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157133 7244 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:38:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA25115 for ; Sat, 14 Nov 1998 15:52:31 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAB05681; Sat, 14 Nov 1998 14:52:23 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 14 Nov 1998 14:52:19 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA19545 for ; Sat, 14 Nov 1998 14:52:11 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA25103 for ; Sat, 14 Nov 1998 15:52:04 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id VAA22954; Sat, 14 Nov 1998 21:52:02 +0100 (MET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > > > (part :type image/gif) > > > (external "~/rms.gif") > > > (end multipart) > > > > Would any of this be visible to the user? > > All of it. This is disturbing to me, because I tend to mail/post lots of Lisp code. > would be a possibility, though... Yes, the `end' things are totally > unLispy. So the multipart would be: > > (multipart :type alternative > (part :type text/plain > This is plain text.) > (part :type image/gif > (external "~/rms.gif"))) > > Er. Double er. The problem with this is that `This is plain text.' must not contain closed parentheses -- or its parens must be balanced, depending on how you implement it -- but both strike me as wrong. Of course, you could roll in your own parser, like in the case of SGML, but it sounds yucky. Again, perhaps it's just me and everyone else is ha-ha-happy about these design ideas for multipart composition. -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Personifiers Unite! You have nothing to lose but Mr. Dignity!