From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/17899
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Some MIME suggestions...
Date: 18 Oct 1998 19:28:37 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <kigu31193ui.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
References: <kigogrgnq9c.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <m3k91yx62r.fsf@sparky.gnus.org> <kigww5y9gg0.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <m367dhu9dg.fsf@sparky.gnus.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035156516 3252 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:28:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:28:36 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA28925
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 13:29:36 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAB13453;
	Sun, 18 Oct 1998 12:29:14 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 18 Oct 1998 12:29:16 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA26009 for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 12:29:07 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA28908
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 13:28:53 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
	by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id TAA27899;
	Sun, 18 Oct 1998 19:28:37 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Attribution: Hrvoje
X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+,
        gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG
        O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h<L@)<XGh#XroV6xQg$VA8K
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "18 Oct 1998 18:23:39 +0200"
Original-Lines: 28
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070034 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.34) XEmacs/21.0 (Danish Landrace)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:17899
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:17899

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> > > Er...  Yes, one really should.  But that kinda makes all the
> > > highlighting and everything away, which makes things a bit
> > > awkward.
> > 
> > Why would that make it awkward?  Aren't highlights *supposed* to go
> > away when you're editing the article?
> 
> I don't really see why.

You have a point.

However, the point stands (IMHO) only as long as we're talking about
highlighting, as opposed to changing the text.  And many currenn
display hooks do change the text, e.g. `W w'.  Somehow I think that
`e' should always present the original article, the same stuff you get 
with `C-u g'.

> It's also an efficiency thing -- re-highlighting everything after
> every little edit would be annoying, especially in large articles.

Are people really editing stuff that often to make this a problem?

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
"Psychos _do not_ explode when sunlight hits them."