From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/15303 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Cool bug in URL parsing Date: 08 Jun 1998 23:32:08 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035154360 21380 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:52:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:52:40 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org (gwyn.tux.org [207.96.122.8]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA08177 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 14:37:56 -0700 Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by gwyn.tux.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA20321 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 17:34:33 -0400 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAS07697; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 16:07:45 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 08 Jun 1998 16:32:44 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA11334 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 16:32:34 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 20717 invoked by uid 504); 8 Jun 1998 21:32:12 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 20714 invoked from network); 8 Jun 1998 21:32:11 -0000 Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@161.53.2.130) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 8 Jun 1998 21:32:10 -0000 Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.8/8.8.6) id XAA11697; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 23:32:08 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/xDi&N7XG KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J In-Reply-To: Jan Vroonhof's message of "08 Jun 1998 21:03:16 +0200" Original-Lines: 27 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.11/XEmacs 21.0(beta41) - "San Clemente" Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:15303 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:15303 Jan Vroonhof writes: > Hrvoje Niksic writes: > > > > The solutions is of course to do it lazily, f.e. using the same > > > technique lazy-shot uses. > > > > Please, no! > > ? Why not? You have something that takes to long to precompute so > you do it on demand? I fail to say why buttonizing is any different > from syntax-highlighting in this regard. It is not. I don't like on-demand fontification either, both conceptually (it makes scrolling slower), and implementationally (none of the current implementations are really good). In fact, if half-cooked on-demand buttonization were added, it would make matters worse, because if someone argued that buttonization was slow, the standard argument would be: "use on-demand buttonization". To conclude, the issues of buttonization speed and on-demand buttonization are orthogonal, and should be treated as such. -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Idle RAM is the Devil's playground.