From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12892 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Intelligent handling of interrupted communication Date: 23 Nov 1997 14:24:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035152350 6236 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:19:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA06696 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 06:44:52 -0800 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA24762 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 08:44:59 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by ifi.uio.no (8.8.8/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with ESMTP id OAA12894 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 14:24:23 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA14936; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 14:24:05 +0100 (MET) Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/xDi&N7XG KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "23 Nov 1997 07:19:42 +0100" Original-Lines: 22 X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.12/XEmacs 20.3 - "Chisinau" Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12892 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12892 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Hrvoje Niksic writes: > > > Aside from my very specific situation, I can think of a number of > > cases where intelligent handling of interrupted communication with the > > news server would come in very handy. Since this is Emacs, all it > > would take is an intelligent `quit' condition-case catcher. > > > > Would it be consider useful enough for Gnus? Would it be possible to > > implement cleanly, given the current abstraction model? > > Yes, I think so. We could just catch the `quit' in Message and close > the connection if it was found. Would this handle server types other than `nntp' correctly? -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- `VI' - An editor used by those heretics that don't subscribe to the Emacs religion.