From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/17890 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Some MIME suggestions... Date: 18 Oct 1998 14:56:31 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035156509 3203 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:28:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA24534 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 09:01:24 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAB06445; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 07:57:28 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 18 Oct 1998 07:57:08 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA23034 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 07:56:58 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA24486 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 08:56:45 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id OAA26715; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 14:56:31 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > Hrvoje Niksic writes: > > > When Gnus prompts me for file name when saving a binary attachment, > > I'd really like to *not* be switched to "*mm*". The binary content > > looks really ugly in Emacs. > > Yes. But textual content looks beautiful in Emacs. True, but textual content should be marked as text/something by the sender. And another point is that the buffer should be placed to a nice place, not just random. Currently I get it instead of the Summary buffer, so it just screws up my display. And it won't remove itself after I save it. :-( > And it is kinda customary to be presented with the buffer you are > saving in Emacs. Although this might be regarded as "copying" > instead. Please do regard it as copying. > > When editing an article via `e', one should be presented the raw > > article. > > Er... Yes, one really should. But that kinda makes all the > highlighting and everything away, which makes things a bit awkward. Why would that make it awkward? Aren't highlights *supposed* to go away when you're editing the article? -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Q: What's an IBM man-year? A: 730 people trying to get a project done before noon.