From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10848 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: timezone.el patterns in emacs 19.34 Date: 03 May 1997 03:14:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <199705020844.EAA06520@kr-laptop.cygnus.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150651 26758 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:50:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA13380 for ; Fri, 2 May 1997 18:22:28 -0700 Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sat, 3 May 1997 03:14:58 +0200 Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4) id DAA14241; Sat, 3 May 1997 03:14:47 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Save-Project-Gutenberg: X-Attribution: Hrv X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/xDi&N7XG KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J In-Reply-To: Ken Raeburn's message of Fri, 2 May 1997 04:44:11 -0400 Original-Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.49/XEmacs 19.15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10848 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10848 Ken Raeburn writes: > I noticed some time ago that timezone-parse-date took up a large > portion of the time of building a summary buffer in Gnus. How large a portion? 20%, 50%? Looking at timezone.el, it looks like it should be written in C. It's not that hard to write, and the speedup would measure by hundreds (all those regexps would become unnecessary). -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- ED WILL NOT CORRUPT YOUR PRECIOUS BODILY FLUIDS!!