From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/19671 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: MIME and mailcrypt Date: 04 Dec 1998 17:32:13 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <871zmgoc4d.fsf@wsfs05.mckesson.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157978 12761 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:52:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA26175 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 1998 11:33:11 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA22006; Fri, 4 Dec 1998 10:32:38 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 04 Dec 1998 10:32:44 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA01494 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 1998 10:32:35 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA26135 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 1998 11:32:26 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id RAA03038; Fri, 4 Dec 1998 17:32:14 +0100 (MET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > "SZ" == Stephen Zander writes: > > Rat> - --==-=-= > > SZ> Was this supposed to be a well-formed MIME message or did mailcrypt > SZ> mangle it? > > PGP armored it. > > Do you begin to see some of the problems with mixing PGP and MIME? Wouldn't this work right if Message knew about multipart/signed, described in rfc2015? Then Gnus could, at least in theory, call the correct mailcrypt hooks to check the signature, and then display the second part of the multipart as usual MIME stuff. Or, am I missing something? -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- A radioactive cat has eighteen half-lives.