From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/17172 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Those MIME requirements Date: 16 Sep 1998 15:13:07 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035155921 31977 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:18:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:18:41 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA01878 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 09:13:35 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAF03802; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 07:44:35 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 16 Sep 1998 08:13:25 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA14665 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 08:13:17 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA01870 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 09:13:09 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id PAA15498; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 15:13:07 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/xDi&N7XG KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "12 Sep 1998 13:41:27 +0200" Original-Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070028 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.28) XEmacs/21.0 (Danish Landrace) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:17172 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:17172 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > I think it does the right thing with the headers -- uses the ones from > the parent as a default, and filling in with the headers from the > part. Makes it trivial to respond to parts. Hmm, the last time I tried to respond to an rfc822 message part, it failed miserably. Perhaps it has been fixed in the meantime. Also, should save the message without the headers (unless, again, we are talking about a message/rfc822 part), and so on. A much nicer behaviour is needed, and nndoc is not good enough to provide it. Try getting used to mutt's `v' command, and you'll see what I mean. -- Hrvoje Niksic | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Union break!