From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/74902 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: bogus group Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:36:09 +0100 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: References: <87wrnivqgh.fsf@dod.no> <2fbp4uj2qb.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <4hipz135vr.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <87bp4tzgdp.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <2hbp4tqpfu.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <8739q5z4fe.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292020634 7572 80.91.229.12 (10 Dec 2010 22:37:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:37:14 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M23258@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Dec 10 23:37:09 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRBaP-0002NX-Ej for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:37:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PRBZe-0007sX-8m; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:36:22 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PRBZb-0007sE-CQ for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:36:19 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PRBZW-0003TQ-FM for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:36:19 -0600 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f45.google.com ([209.85.215.45]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PRBZV-0002oP-00 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:36:13 +0100 Original-Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so2987313ewy.32 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:36:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:organization :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tLtxsufcuCmwx+uD4Iulkm40t+gecxjHkbxEZMWdQyw=; b=CoRfV8VHYP/nNECpOIU+imb97Bq15XHujIvIz31jdDSP7e+ACtaGH90KKqFZ98rnrA LSAZGJ5rcj5jT/83DVmOGTKdRN+99LUX98TP2sMMiprGmtwzW09yVmoZvs9IEse2JGLU uTI10M+A965Zh4QdylahyBk7KLn5savFVQYfw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UO79ktg8JKpgK6H7aeMApLrFjzIc4vBtVHVu5Ai6T6hcLKmJ963ZZlMv62x7GiCcTi 7PkctnIG670n0lA6sRJevqfEMw8gfwxzLGBpuOndOneipy6WmxrDiLnhqhIhhYSjiaeB dfS5xZLH4rfVrY2JAwBEHcznN0O5NP3xxT4jk= Original-Received: by 10.213.109.15 with SMTP id h15mr1573767ebp.30.1292020572544; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:36:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x54sm2702723eeh.5.2010.12.10.14.36.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:36:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8739q5z4fe.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> ("Adam =?utf-8?Q?Sj?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=B8gren=22's?= message of "Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:47:01 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:74902 Archived-At: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sj=C3=B8gren) writes: > On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:37:57 +0100, Richard wrote: > >> Whats the simplest split rule to put it into "inbox"? > > My nnmail-split-fancy looks like this: > > (setq nnmail-split-fancy > '(| > ; Get rid of spam: > (: spam-split) > ; [... splitting out into various groups elided ...] > "normal")) > > Email that isn't spam (and not sorted out to folders by any of the > elided rules) ends up in my (nnml:)normal folder. > > Note that I do not use imap, and I'm not really sure whether inbox has > some special significance there. imap has nothing to do with nnmail does it? > >> And I assume this only applies to nnmail? I'm not sure I even >> understand what nnmail is to be honest... Im kind of Gnus'd out and >> cant see the wood for the trees. > > I don't quite know what the nnmail prefix signifies, perhaps "this is > used for mail (not news), regardless of which nn* backend is used"? Wild > guess... caveat emptor - I'm sure someone will correct me now :-) Heh. I have nnimap backs ends talking to dovecot which is fed by offlineimap. No worries. But simply reading my system email is becoming quite a chore.