Bad MIME or Gnus problem?

Bad MIME or Gnus problem?

[Jorge Godoy]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 256 bytes --]


Sorry for the size of this message, but the message below appears
completely broken when I try viewing it here.

Is it a MIME problem or is it a Gnus problem?


(I hope the forward maintain the problem)


See you,
-- 
Godoy.     <godoy@metalab.unc.edu>



[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 40066 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 408 bytes --]

Bremm <29504> escreveu em Qui 24 Out 2002 23:05...

> Nome: gkrellm
> Versão: 1.2.13-3mdk
> Tamanho: 1586 KB
> 
> Resumo: Multiple stacked system monitors

Screenshots (tema Aqua):
-- 
B r e m m  -  I C Q  1 0 9 0 2 2 8
L i n u x  U s e r   # 2 5 3 9 9 4

IT'S POTATO, NOT POTATOE
IT'S POTATO, NOT POTATOE
IT'S POTATO, NOT POTATOE
IT'S POTATO, NOT POTATOE

        Bart Simpson on chalkboard in episode 7F01

[-- Attachment #2.1.2: gkrellm1.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 11700 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2.1.3: gkrellm2.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 16943 bytes --]

Re: Bad MIME or Gnus problem?

[Simon Josefsson]

Jorge Godoy <godoy@metalab.unc.edu> writes:

> Sorry for the size of this message, but the message below appears
> completely broken when I try viewing it here.
>
> Is it a MIME problem or is it a Gnus problem?
>
>
> (I hope the forward maintain the problem)

It looks fine here.  Could you post a screenshot of what you see?
Maybe forwarding it fixed it.

Re: Bad MIME or Gnus problem?

[Jorge Godoy]

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:

> It looks fine here.  Could you post a screenshot of what you see?

I'll do that in the next message.

> Maybe forwarding it fixed it.

It did fixed it. :-(
Maybe it can help as a clue to where is the problem...


See you,
-- 
Godoy.     <godoy@ieee.org>

Re: Bad MIME or Gnus problem?

[Jorge Godoy]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 462 bytes --]

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:

> Jorge Godoy <godoy@metalab.unc.edu> writes:
>
>> Sorry for the size of this message, but the message below appears
>> completely broken when I try viewing it here.
>>
>> Is it a MIME problem or is it a Gnus problem?
>>
>>
>> (I hope the forward maintain the problem)
>
> It looks fine here.  Could you post a screenshot of what you see?
> Maybe forwarding it fixed it.

Here it is.

-- 
Godoy.     <godoy@ieee.org>



[-- Attachment #2: screenshot.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 26788 bytes --]

Re: Bad MIME or Gnus problem?

[Kai Großjohann]

Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org> writes:

> Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:
>
>> It looks fine here.  Could you post a screenshot of what you see?
>> Maybe forwarding it fixed it.
>
> Here it is.

Does the message have a header "Mime-Version: 1.0"?  Does it help to
add it?

kai
-- 
~/.signature is: umop ap!sdn    (Frank Nobis)

Re: Bad MIME or Gnus problem?

[Jorge Godoy]

kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann) writes:

> Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org> writes:
>
>> Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:
>>
>>> It looks fine here.  Could you post a screenshot of what you see?
>>> Maybe forwarding it fixed it.
>>
>> Here it is.
>
> Does the message have a header "Mime-Version: 1.0"?  Does it help to
> add it?

No, it doesn't have this header. I think there should be some MIME
information too, but there were only these headers that I've shown in
the message. The other were added by the NNTP server or had no
relevant information.


How can I edit a message that's stored in an NNTP server without
modifying it before? (Gnus corrected the problem when I forwarded the
message) 


-- 
Godoy.     <godoy@ieee.org>

Re: Bad MIME or Gnus problem?

[Nelson Ferreira]

Does (setq gnus-article-mime-loose t) help ?

"Jorge" == Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org> writes:

    Jorge> kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann) writes:
    >> Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org> writes:
    >>
    >>> Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:
    >>>
    >>>> It looks fine here.  Could you post a screenshot of what you
    >>>> see?  Maybe forwarding it fixed it.
    >>>
    >>> Here it is.
    >>
    >> Does the message have a header "Mime-Version: 1.0"?  Does it
    >> help to add it?

    Jorge> No, it doesn't have this header. I think there should be
    Jorge> some MIME information too, but there were only these
    Jorge> headers that I've shown in the message. The other were
    Jorge> added by the NNTP server or had no relevant information.

    Jorge> How can I edit a message that's stored in an NNTP server
    Jorge> without modifying it before? (Gnus corrected the problem
    Jorge> when I forwarded the message)

    Jorge> -- Godoy.  <godoy@ieee.org>

-- 
Nelson Ferreira

Re: Bad MIME or Gnus problem?

[Nelson Ferreira]

Oops. Sorry, I meant

(setq gnus-article-loose-mime t)   

--Nelson

"njsf" == Nelson Ferreira <nelson.ferreira@verizon.net> writes:

    njsf> Does (setq gnus-article-mime-loose t) help ?  

    njsf> "Jorge" == Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org> writes:

    Jorge> kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann) writes:
    >>> Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org> writes:
    >>>
    >>>> Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:
    >>>>
    >>>>> It looks fine here.  Could you post a screenshot of what you
    >>>>> see?  Maybe forwarding it fixed it.
    >>>>
    >>>> Here it is.
    >>>
    >>> Does the message have a header "Mime-Version: 1.0"?  Does it
    >>> help to add it?

    Jorge> No, it doesn't have this header. I think there should be
    Jorge> some MIME information too, but there were only these
    Jorge> headers that I've shown in the message. The other were
    Jorge> added by the NNTP server or had no relevant information.

    Jorge> How can I edit a message that's stored in an NNTP server
    Jorge> without modifying it before? (Gnus corrected the problem
    Jorge> when I forwarded the message)

    Jorge> -- Godoy.  <godoy@ieee.org>

    njsf> -- Nelson Ferreira

-- 
Nelson Ferreira

Re: Bad MIME or Gnus problem?

[Jesper Harder]

Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org> writes:

> kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann) writes:
>
>> Does the message have a header "Mime-Version: 1.0"?  Does it help to
>> add it?
>
> No, it doesn't have this header. 

If that's the problem, then setting `gnus-article-loose-mime' to t might
help.

Re: Bad MIME or Gnus problem?

[Jorge Godoy]

Jesper Harder <harder@ifa.au.dk> writes:

> Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org> writes:
>
>> kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann) writes:
>>
>>> Does the message have a header "Mime-Version: 1.0"?  Does it help to
>>> add it?
>>
>> No, it doesn't have this header. 
>
> If that's the problem, then setting `gnus-article-loose-mime' to t might
> help.

It solves the problem on my side, but is the syntax of the message
sent correct? Shouldn't it have the Mime-Version header?


-- 
Godoy.     <godoy@ieee.org>

Re: Bad MIME or Gnus problem?

[Jesper Harder]

Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org> writes:

> Jesper Harder <harder@ifa.au.dk> writes:
>
>> Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org> writes:
>>
>>> kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann) writes:
>>>
>>>> Does the message have a header "Mime-Version: 1.0"?  Does it help to
>>>> add it?
>>>
>>> No, it doesn't have this header. 
>>
>> If that's the problem, then setting `gnus-article-loose-mime' to t might
>> help.
>
> It solves the problem on my side, but is the syntax of the message
> sent correct? 

Nope. MIME messages must have a MIME-Version header.

Re: Bad MIME or Gnus problem?

[Kai Großjohann]

Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org> writes:

> It solves the problem on my side, but is the syntax of the message
> sent correct? Shouldn't it have the Mime-Version header?

The original message should have had the Mime-Version header, yes.
But then, it's not your fault, nor Gnus' fault.  I gather that the
original message that looked fishy was not sent from Gnus?

kai
-- 
~/.signature is: umop ap!sdn    (Frank Nobis)

Re: Bad MIME or Gnus problem?

[Jorge Godoy]

kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann) writes:

> Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org> writes:
>
>> It solves the problem on my side, but is the syntax of the message
>> sent correct? Shouldn't it have the Mime-Version header?
>
> The original message should have had the Mime-Version header, yes.
> But then, it's not your fault, nor Gnus' fault.  I gather that the
> original message that looked fishy was not sent from Gnus?

Nope. Probably from kmail or sylpheed. I'll ask.

-- 
Godoy.     <godoy@ieee.org>