From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/47445
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Bad MIME or Gnus problem?
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:54:25 -0300
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <kpwuo3bqtq.fsf@wintermute.casa>
References: <kpu1ja1s9v.fsf@wintermute.casa>
	<ilusmyuec0f.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <kpd6py1mo1.fsf@wintermute.casa>
	<84elaea0xd.fsf@crybaby.uni-duisburg.de>
	<kpy98mz9x4.fsf@wintermute.casa> <m3n0p1d9ci.fsf@defun.localdomain>
	<kp7kg5zbva.fsf@wintermute.casa>
	<84znt1s7z2.fsf@crybaby.uni-duisburg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035748633 16688 80.91.224.249 (27 Oct 2002 19:57:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:57:13 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 185tX6-0004L2-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 20:57:12 +0100
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 185tWi-0003Y7-00; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:56:48 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:57:32 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA06006
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:57:15 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (qmail 3794 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2002 19:56:07 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 3787 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2002 19:56:05 -0000
Original-Received: from panda.sul.com.br (HELO ns.sul.com.br) (200.219.150.4)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 27 Oct 2002 19:56:05 -0000
Original-Received: from wintermute.casa (3-216.ctame701-5.telepar.net.br [200.181.180.216])
	by ns.sul.com.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9RIuZm82989;
	Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:56:37 -0200 (BRST)
	(envelope-from godoy@ieee.org)
Original-Received: by wintermute.casa (Postfix, from userid 550)
	id 2F50D4B8EC; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:54:25 -0300 (BRT)
Original-To: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
X-URL: <http://www.g2ctech.com/>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Disclaimer: Unless explicitly stated, opinions on this message are
 strictly mine
In-Reply-To: <84znt1s7z2.fsf@crybaby.uni-duisburg.de> (kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de's
 message of "Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:25:05 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2
 (i386-conectiva-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:47445
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:47445

kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann) writes:

> Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org> writes:
>
>> It solves the problem on my side, but is the syntax of the message
>> sent correct? Shouldn't it have the Mime-Version header?
>
> The original message should have had the Mime-Version header, yes.
> But then, it's not your fault, nor Gnus' fault.  I gather that the
> original message that looked fishy was not sent from Gnus?

Nope. Probably from kmail or sylpheed. I'll ask.

-- 
Godoy.     <godoy@ieee.org>