Re: Problems with gnus-registry

[David <de_bb@arcor.de>]

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> D> By the way, I'm currently playing around with the registry labels and
> D> was wondering: what would currently be the best way to get all message
> D> ids with a certain label? This way, I could easily create nnmairix
> D> groups containing only these messages.
>
> TZ> Currently there's no reverse mapping.  We have it for subject and
> TZ> sender, and it should be fairly easy to generalize it for multi-value
> TZ> entries like the labels.  See gnus-registry-fetch-extra-entry for the
> TZ> cache insertion part; gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent uses the
> TZ> cache.  I think the code could be much better, BTW.
>
> David, do you still need this?  Have you tried maphash against the whole
> registry to see if it's fast enough, or do we still need labels?

Yes, I've tried it with maphash. It takes about 0.1sec and my registry
has ~17k entries. I'd say that's fast enough. :-)

-David