From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66278 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Problems with gnus-registry Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:58:17 +0100 Message-ID: References: <76sl0vma5q.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86k5loxulw.fsf@lifelogs.com> <76tzkoq1t4.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <868x20wi2a.fsf@lifelogs.com> <76y7a0nyo3.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86lk60uwwq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <764pconmz4.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86abmfv3ig.fsf@lifelogs.com> <767ihjm5qn.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86myqfoxrv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <76y79zkpnx.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <868x1yp3lr.fsf@lifelogs.com> <86odasai1l.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202471921 3866 80.91.229.12 (8 Feb 2008 11:58:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:58:41 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14769@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Feb 08 12:59:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JNRsi-0008Ah-A1 for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:59:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JNRs5-0004m9-2y; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:58:21 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JNRs3-0004lo-KM for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:58:19 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JNRrx-0008Po-7o for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:58:19 -0600 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1JNRs0-0006NV-00 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:58:16 +0100 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JNRrt-0004FJ-DA for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:58:09 +0000 Original-Received: from kafka.physik3.gwdg.de ([134.76.92.48]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:58:09 +0000 Original-Received: from de_bb by kafka.physik3.gwdg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:58:09 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 19 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kafka.physik3.gwdg.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ANJKglwB19AeHdux6/t5GKIMKxA= X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66278 Archived-At: Reiner Steib writes: > As we want to store marks (or "labels") in the registry, wouldn't it > make sense to have two different variables? (Though both should/could > contain "ignore" in the name, like the related nnmail-* variables.) A > user might want to ignore some groups for parent splitting, but want > to set marks in these groups. I second that, please keep both variables. But I think it should be made clearer that the variable currently named gnus-registry-unfollowed-groups is related to splitting only, so maybe call it gnus-registry-split-with-parent-ignored-groups or something like that. By the way, I'm currently playing around with the registry labels and was wondering: what would currently be the best way to get all message ids with a certain label? This way, I could easily create nnmairix groups containing only these messages. -David