From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/50343 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Andrew A. Raines" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Envelope sender lost from sending after gnus-draft-edit-message Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:58:18 -0600 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <84k7fq17q3.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1046105990 3297 80.91.224.249 (24 Feb 2003 16:59:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:59:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18nLxC-0000qa-00 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:59:46 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18nLwU-0003bJ-00; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:59:02 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 24 Feb 2003 11:00:02 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA06370 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:59:46 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 4670 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2003 16:58:41 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 4665 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2003 16:58:40 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (80.91.224.244) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 24 Feb 2003 16:58:40 -0000 Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18nMBN-0007Aq-00 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:14:25 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-Lines: 22 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: williams.mc.vanderbilt.edu Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1046106865 27579 160.129.208.222 (24 Feb 2003 17:14:25 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Feb 2003 17:14:25 GMT X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD2D3002F Mail-Copies-To: never Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEXVTAP+0HX/9ZqUGQD+vWD+ pkj7gyT+4YOd8kCEAAACGElEQVR4nFWTQavcMAyEBYHcDSm+55JrIL8gYPf8Ho19NrTx3cuC/35n pJhtvSyb+LOksTQrx7EfsoscuxzHIdMu04QHfTsmGaBOPIP9ScHOTZnxUH8DTP+B/QOY/FBw4EXm WpCqWADeZQcoSD1XFKhVSwjl8AjAXFMqAEUYIBMzTDghc04pV6zCAETUOxlIMSWyoooF4PqlBe5w hRBAeCmkyn/OzPz55n6IicKI0uXf1+mCiyk450aIgt77hm9z3rlFQ6g4fQO8tnVdlS1BI6AnnQDY foH2brkqVcVT97G2jSEqrMxVgkMmAy8k8w7CeFEAb/tWxKNMSrgVgBupui4CLILXOM/t7hftjUC6 d12l2moL6gNQO5uxsCEnyQB9PGIB2ZFIgAsyLWdxp+vioRizmBgXKR0LPxpb5ZHZogFl961g3dBX ZBtgZtIHYBbPIJ4Qi1hbvM4l5mKmtSIKthZqykW9t+M4dGWxdvxQ26gpK0Ycs6Va1/dXMbPuAlNQ /ANa/qJn6TWA8wO28PPRNKPE8gG4uhmK+6eCZ3xt0WahIegjnwfoS4gc9aWtZ8SYa1Pj3MFzYJT7 D4A96DL4ka57vNMVpAtTplEA/AegEzATPeQAmhmR5gwRlwZx7o3u4kE9xeIYKwA9b6ATMCLEYBYa gKZVrzwGAsgwHMBra4NwHzKqAv6hvHvIgk9S4M21TY/GiEL8i/4FhdwINKKStVYAAAAASUVORK5C YII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code) Cancel-Lock: sha1:tC5whL7Q3vN+eC1VCCudZFP3Zmg= Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50343 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50343 kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann) writes: > "Andrew A. Raines" writes: > >> What's the difference sendmail-wise between hitting `C-c C-c' on >> a newly composed messge and doing it after `D e'? > > Gnus (sometimes) passes "-f foo" as an arg to sendmail, where the > foo comes from a (buffer-local?) variable. OK, this makes sense. But why does Gnus pass -f sometimes? Shouldn't the sendmail binary (or, in this case, qmail's sendmail compatibility wrapper) do the right thing with the envelope? I know qmail-inject does. > To fix this particular problem, only the value for the -f arg needs > to be remembered, though. Perhaps no -f is needed in the first place? -- Andrew A. Raines