From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/22651 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Bihlmeyer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Bug in multipart/alternative Date: 20 Apr 1999 15:28:23 +0200 Organization: Area 51 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87hfsp969d.fsf@mattdav.vip.best.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035160532 30438 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:35:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:35:32 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA00190 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 09:33:14 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAB22106; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 08:29:05 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 20 Apr 1999 08:29:37 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA28628 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 08:29:26 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mars.zserv.tuwien.ac.at (mars.zserv.tuwien.ac.at [193.170.75.15]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA29981 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 09:29:17 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (qmail 2628 invoked by uid 524); 20 Apr 1999 13:28:23 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Robbe In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "18 Apr 1999 20:05:14 +0200" Original-Lines: 27 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070068 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.68) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:22651 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:22651 Hi, >>>>> On 18 Apr 1999 20:05:14 +0200 >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen said: >> > What on earth should one do? Should there be a test for >> > multipart/* to see whether (after iterating over the arbitrarily >> > complex tree) Gnus really can display it after all? [...] Lars> Yes, but I'm having difficulty envisioning the predicate Lars> function here. What are the rules we are after, really? A part is displayable, if a) it is a non-aggregate (text/*, image/*, ...), and the usual tests succeed (can this Emacs display html, gif, etc.) b) it is a multipart/alternative, and one of its subpart is displayable c) is is a multipart/*, and all its subparts are displayable b+c do the recursion thingy. Robbe -- Robert Bihlmeyer reads: Deutsch, English, MIME, Latin-1, NO SPAM!