From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/23959
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Robert Bihlmeyer <e9426626@stud2.tuwien.ac.at>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: some mail annoyances
Date: 07 Jul 1999 13:30:20 +0200
Organization: The Cabal (There Is None)
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <lfaet88zoz.fsf@mars.zserv.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <m2k8sx6ph3.fsf@magnus.bothner.com> <m37lohnomf.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <vafhfnks66u.fsf@petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <lfg133awyd.fsf@mars.zserv.tuwien.ac.at> <oqr9mnymkq.fsf@titan.progiciels-bpi.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161596 6038 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:53:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:53:16 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA11964
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 07:34:17 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAB28715;
	Wed, 7 Jul 1999 06:30:55 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 07 Jul 1999 06:31:43 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA05615
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 06:31:25 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mars.zserv.tuwien.ac.at (mars.zserv.tuwien.ac.at [193.170.75.15])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA11941
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 07:30:20 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 18809 invoked by uid 524); 7 Jul 1999 11:30:20 -0000
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Attribution: Robbe
Mail-Copies-To: never
In-Reply-To: François Pinard's message of "05 Jul 1999 14:32:21 -0400"
Original-Lines: 19
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070068 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.68) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23959
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23959

Hi,

>>>>> On 05 Jul 1999 14:32:21 -0400
>>>>> François Pinard <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca> said:

 FP> Robert Bihlmeyer <e9426626@stud2.tuwien.ac.at> writes:

 FP> I've not much experience with ticked articles, but I just want to
 FP> voice that for me, the current color for them is appropriate.

Alerting Red is good for the normal ticked semantic ("something that
I have to work on in the future"), but no good for Kai's "old mail
gets ticked" scheme. IMHO, YMMV, etc.

	Robbe

-- 
Robert Bihlmeyer	reads: Deutsch, English, MIME, Latin-1, NO SPAM!
<robbe@orcus.priv.at>	<http://stud2.tuwien.ac.at/~e9426626/sig.html>