From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/25761 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Bihlmeyer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Display of inline messag/rfc822 (aka MIME forwards) Date: 08 Oct 1999 18:25:31 +0200 Organization: The Cabal (There Is None) Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163090 15739 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:18:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA14717 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 12:31:23 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAB02212; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 11:27:20 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 08 Oct 1999 11:27:34 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA24132 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 11:27:25 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mars.zserv.tuwien.ac.at (mars.zserv.tuwien.ac.at [193.170.75.15]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA14694 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 12:25:28 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (qmail 29090 invoked by uid 524); 8 Oct 1999 16:25:31 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Robbe In-Reply-To: François Pinard's message of "04 Oct 1999 20:20:36 -0400" Original-Lines: 39 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 21.1 - "Biscayne" Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:25761 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:25761 Hi, >>>>> On 04 Oct 1999 20:20:36 -0400 >>>>> François Pinard said: FP> These principles are fruitful for cases like in-lined FP> message/rfc822. I'm including a picture of your demonstration, FP> below. For me, it is absolutely clear that I'm looking at a FP> quoted message. for me, it's not. It could be a colored message body (text/enriched, text/html). Furthermore, my headers are not colored in all configurations (think: vt220), so in this cases the message/message boundary is even more elusive. FP> When the message has signature, which is the usual case, such FP> problems do not exist, as Gnus uses a pretty characteristic FP> rendering for signatures. Again, not in all configurations. Also, denying the problem for "the usual case", which is not so usual in my opinion (broken mailers abound), will not make it go away. FP> Maybe that Gnus could invent a mere `-- ' (rendered as a FP> signature) when rendering a message/rfc822 in a MIME part, which FP> has no recognised signature? That could be a solution. But is it workable in most configurations? FP> Here is the promised picture: FWIW, I don't consider sending messages > 500 lines without asking first good etiquette. Robbe -- Robert Bihlmeyer reads: Deutsch, English, MIME, Latin-1, NO SPAM!