From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/25131 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Bihlmeyer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: extra .ATT attachments? Date: 16 Sep 1999 20:27:24 +0200 Organization: Area 51 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035162574 12445 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:09:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA01398 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:28:54 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAB31832; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 13:28:12 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 16 Sep 1999 13:28:14 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA07030 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 13:28:04 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mars.zserv.tuwien.ac.at (mars.zserv.tuwien.ac.at [193.170.75.15]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA01351 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:27:22 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (qmail 22466 invoked by uid 524); 16 Sep 1999 18:27:24 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Robbe In-Reply-To: Nathan Williams's message of "16 Sep 1999 11:40:27 -0400" Original-Lines: 42 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070095 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.95) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:25131 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:25131 Hi, >>>>> On 16 Sep 1999 11:40:27 -0400 >>>>> Nathan Williams said: Nathan> However, I think that in the case that brought this up, it is Nathan> expected that the signature be part of the traditional Nathan> message body. There is no "traditional message body" per se. It is a mime message consisting of three parts. If MS Outhouse can't dig that, I don't know. I think of attachments being attached to a *specific*point* in the message. I frequently write ,- | blabla | | Here's the new version of foo.pl | | [MML-code that attaches foo.pl] | | bar.pl is unchanged, but you'll need to install the new baz.pm, too: | | [MML-code that attaches baz.pm] | | blabla, signature, end `- I don't want my attachments moved around, I want them exactly where they are. One thing that has come up before is a simple "attach this to the message" command. This one could tack the attachment onto the end of the message, if we want this. Robbe -- Robert Bihlmeyer reads: Deutsch, English, MIME, Latin-1, NO SPAM!